1-s2.0-S1534580716309182-main.pdf (3.26 MB)
Non-canonical and sexually dimorphic X dosage compensation states in the mouse and human germline
journal contributionposted on 2020-10-16, 14:01 authored by Mahesh N Sangrithi, Helene Royo, Shantha K Mahadevaiah, Obah Ojarikre, Leena Bhaw, Abdul Sesay, Antoine HFM Peters, Michael Stadler, James MA Turner
Somatic X dosage compensation requires two mechanisms: X inactivation balances X gene output between males (XY) and females (XX), while X upregulation, hypothesized by Ohno and documented in vivo, balances X gene with autosomal gene output. Whether X dosage compensation occurs in germ cells is unclear. We show that mouse and human germ cells exhibit non-canonical X dosage states that differ from the soma and between the sexes. Prior to genome-wide reprogramming, X upregulation is present, consistent with Ohno's hypothesis. Subsequently, however, it is erased. In females, erasure follows loss of X inactivation, causing X dosage excess. Conversely, in males, erasure leads to permanent X dosage decompensation. Sex chromosomally abnormal models exhibit a "sex-reversed" X dosage state: XX males, like XX females, develop X dosage excess, while XO females, like XY males, develop X dosage decompensation. Thus, germline X dosage compensation states are determined by X chromosome number, not phenotypic sex. These unexpected differences in X dosage compensation states between germline and soma offer unique perspectives on sex chromosome infertility.
X inactivationX upregulationdosage compensationgenome-wide reprogramminggermline developmentsex chromosomesAnimalsCellular ReprogrammingChromosomes, Human, XDatabases, GeneticDosage Compensation, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGerm CellsGonadsHumansMaleMiceModels, GeneticSequence Analysis, RNASex CharacteristicsUp-RegulationX ChromosomeTurner FC001193AS06 Biological Sciences11 Medical and Health SciencesDevelopmental Biology